News Here are phylogeny packages and 54 free web servers , almost all that I know about. It is an attempt to be completely comprehensive. I have not made any attempt to exclude programs that do not meet some standard of quality or importance. Updates to these pages are made roughly monthly. Here is a “waiting list” of new programs waiting to have their full entries constructed. Many of the programs in these pages are available on the web, and some of the older ones are also available from ftp server machines. The programs listed below include both free and non-free ones; in some cases I do not know whether a program is free. I have listed as free those that I knew were free; for the others you have to ask their distributor. Usually when I say that a program is downloadable from a web site, this means that it is available free.
25 Reasons to Doubt the Theory of Evolution
By elpidiovaldes In Science Here of some of the well-tested methods of dating used in the study of early humans: Potassium-argon dating, Argon-argon dating, Carbon or Radiocarbon , and Uranium series: All of these methods measure the amount of radioactive decay of chemical elements; the decay occurs in a consistent manner, like a clock, over long periods of time. All of these methods measure the amount of electrons that get absorbed and trapped inside a rock or tooth over time.
Since animal species change over time, the fauna can be arranged from younger to older.
Suddenly the lights went on. My audience saw, in a nutshell, the way dating methods work. 1 Scientific dating is not a way of measuring but a way of thinking.
Lots of dating method problems will be added here soon. Have blood cells ever been found in dinosaur fossils? Actual red blood cells in fossil bones from a Tyrannosaurus rex? With traces of the blood protein hemoglobin which makes blood red and carries oxygen? It sounds preposterous—to those who believe that these dinosaur remains are at least 65 million years old. It is of course much less of a surprise to those who believe Genisis, in which case dinosaur remains are at most only a few thousand years old.
1. Rate of Decay
Genetic data based on molecular clock estimates support a Late Miocene ancestry. Various Eurasian and African Miocene primates have been advocated as possible ancestors to the early hominins, which came on the scene during the Pliocene Epoch 5. Though there is no consensus among experts, the primates suggested include Kenyapithecus, Griphopithecus, Dryopithecus , Graecopithecus Ouranopithecus , Samburupithecus, Sahelanthropus, and Orrorin. Kenyapithecus inhabited Kenya and Griphopithecus lived in central Europe and Turkey from about 16 to 14 mya.
Dryopithecus is best known from western and central Europe, where it lived from 13 to possibly 8 mya. Graecopithecus lived in northern and southern Greece about 9 mya, at roughly the same time as Samburupithecus in northern Kenya.
Creation or Evolution: Do We Have to Choose? [Denis Alexander] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Dr Denis Alexander is a neuroscientist who believes passionately in both the biblical doctrine of creation and the coherence of evolutionary theory. His book draws on the latest genetic research. What do we mean by creation and evolution?
Primary source references As a preface to this document, I want to point out that it is a shame that we have to continue to refute the same arguments that evolutionists keep bringing up over and over again in their attempts to argue against the fact of creation, which fact has been well established since the day the earth was created ex nihilo several thousand years ago. It is also a shame that the masses have bought all this based on some circular reasoning about fossils, where fossils tend to be found buried, similarities between various life forms, the presence of certain decay products in rocks, and other inherently speculative arguments about the past, based on phenomena that exist in the present.
If I hope to accomplish anything, it will be to simply encourage critical thinking. One must get past the arguments ad populum that its popularity counts for something , ad hominem that if you attack the person making the argument, this counts for something , and especially ad baculum that there are people who have the clout to decree it as true , to ask the key questions and challenge the unsubstantiated assumptions and thinking of those who would hold to the evolution position.
Today there are an increasing number of anti-creationist authors who are producing books and periodicals that make this relatively brief presentation insufficient to deal with all the points in dispute. Those defending creation today who don’t have the time to devote their life’s study to gaining expertise in all fields of inquiry must principally be prepared to think critically, logically, and challenge unsubstantiated assumptions made by these people.
They must also keep a level head in the face of some vicious attacks and diatribes that will be directed against them, as is advised in the scriptures 1 Peter 3: By way of definitions, I want to point out that when I speak of “evolution,” I am referring to the popular contemporary use of the word, which in a nutshell is the belief that all life forms are related by ancestry, and that the first life form occurred spontaneously, all due to completely natural processes.
When I speak of “creation,” I am referring to the inherently obvious fact that the origin of all life forms can be attributed to a creator who purposefully created them with planning and intent, and the documented fact that this occurred over the course of a week’s time several thousand years ago. This document is not a scientific thesis, but an apologetic intended to be submitted and defended by me in an interactive, online electronic forum.
I claim no copyright on this document, and grant its use to the public domain. I have not written it with a view towards receiving any sort of financial or other personal gain, and I request that others utilizing this document do likewise. Those copying and disseminating this document shall assume full responsibility for defending it. I do not agree to defend this document in any forum that I did not submit it, due to the practical limitations of my own time.
WHAT ARE CREATION SAFARIS?
My friends call me Ape Jaw Evan. Click here to read about me and other media myths, frauds, and lies. The Theory of Evolution is not a scientific law or a law of biology. Failure to meet only one challenge proves the law is wrong.
Scientific Facts Proving Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is Wrong, False, and Impossible. News You Can Use. Hi, my name is Evolutionary Fraud from Piltdown, England.
Important We believe any unbiased reader will realize that we were fair with our treatment of the two models in the table above. Yet, although the theory of evolution matches the facts in some cases, evolution is still an unproven theory. By now, you may believe it should be your first choice also. Unlike many others that preceded us, we attempted to find a clear defense of evolution for two reasons: To keep from being accused of bias. To keep from making claims that someone could refute later.
Even though there are a great number of claims in books and on the Internet, we could find no scientific, testable facts that support the theory of evolution. The best site we could find was at The University of California at Berkeley. If you are interested, click here to examine the scientific evidence recorded at UC Berkeley yourself.
This age is obtained from radiometric dating and is assumed by evolutionists to provide a sufficiently long time-frame for Darwinian evolution. And OE Christians theistic evolutionists see no problem with this dating whilst still accepting biblical creation, see Radiometric Dating – A Christian Perspective. This is the crucial point: Some claim Genesis in particular, and the Bible in general looks mythical from this standpoint.
A full discussion of the topic must therefore include the current scientific challenge to the OE concept. This challenge is mainly headed by Creationism which teaches a young-earth YE theory.
Unlike observation-based relative dating, most absolute methods require some of the find to be destroyed by heat or other means. Radiometric Dating This family of dating methods, some more than a century old, takes advantage of the environment’s natural radioactivity.
Creation With acknowledgement to Dr. Walt Brown, Center for Scientific Creation 1. It is an established scientific fact that life cannot originate from non-living matter the Law of Biogenesis. The chemical evolution of life is impossible. No scientist has ever advanced a testable procedure by which this could occur. The Miller-Urey experiment, still shown in many current textbooks, has been proven to be irrelevant. Mendel’s Laws of Genetics limit the variations in a species.
Different combinations of genes are formed, but not different genes. Breeding experiments and common observations have also confirmed that genetic boundaries exist. Acquired characteristics cannot be inherited. For example, the long necks of giraffes did not result from their ancestors stretching their necks to reach high leaves, nor does a man in a weight-lifting program pass his well-developed muscles on to his child.
Radioisotope dating shows the earth to be billions of years old. T38, 4: What We Really Know about Dating Methods When someone mentions scientific dating methods, the first thing to come to mind for most people is carbon dating. However, there are many methods that can be used to determine the age of the earth or other objects.
Feb 08, · Human Evolution Dating Methods On February 8, May 17, By elpidiovaldes In Science Here of some of the well-tested methods of dating used in the study of early humans.
Here of some of mmethods well-tested methods of dating used in the The Dating Rocks and Fossils Using Geological Analtze article the evidence for events. Here of some of the well-tested methods of dating used in the The Dating Rocks and Fossils Using Geological Methods article the evidence for events. How are dating methods used to analyze fossil evidence Where are marker rings generally located in living trees. What is an isotope. When paleoclimatologists drill a coral core, they can count the growth bands and date samples exactly.
See Oldest Living Organism. HBio – Chapter 18 – Fossil Evidence for Evolution Flashcards Quizlet Matching layers of rock from different areas by examining the rock itself and also by eating the fossils it contains. In this way, sites that do not have radioactive or other materials for dating can be given a reliable age estimate.
When paleoclimatologists drill a coral core, fodsil can count the growth bands and date samples exactly. What has AMS radiocarbon dating allowed scientists to date. Wiens addresses specifically the claims, misrepresentations and distortions of fundamentalists who lie about dating reliability in their attempt to prove evolution wrong. State the three conditions necessary for fossil formation and explain briefly.
Your one-stop source for information on evolution. An idea of the climatic conditions prevailing at the time may then be worked out.
Have blood cells ever been found in dinosaur fossils?
There are lots of ways to guesstimate ages, and geologists knew the earth was old a long time ago and I might add that they were mostly Christian creationist geologists. But they didn’t know how old. Radiometric dating actually allows the measurement of absolute ages, and so it is deadly to the argument that the earth cannot be more than 10, years old.
Radiometric methods measure the time elapsed since the particular radiometric clock was reset.
Contact Me Dating Methods Science uses many dating methods to determine the age of the earth, of the layers in the earth, and of fossils. We will discuss some of those on this page. The Geologic Column Kent Hovind has made himself wealthy and wound up in jail for tax evasion and ” structuring cash transactions ” by claiming that “there is only one place in all the world to see the standard geologic column. That’s in the textbook! The fact is, the geologic column is found many places around the earth.
Note on that page that drilling led to one more place being found in Strata in the Geologic Column Mr. Hovind is also fond of saying that geologists use fossils to date the layers of the geologic column, but they also use the layers of the geologic column to date the fossils. Amazingly, this claim of Mr. Hovind’s is true; however, there’s a good reason why. There are also some amazing consistencies in the geologic column that cannot be explained except by the fact that our dating methods are accurate.